Showing posts with label Cynthia Lardner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cynthia Lardner. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Rethinking Ferguson


ferguson1

By:    Cynthia M. Lardner


Introduction

It was August 9, 2014 when 18-year-old Michael Brown was fatally shot by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri.  Michael Brown was not and never will be a statistic. He had a family and friends. He was a young man just embarking upon the journey we call adulthood.  No doubt he had hopes and dreams as to what the future might bring.  At the time of his death Michael Brown was unarmed.  Michael Brown was also African-American.  He was Black.
“At the time of the shooting…only three of the 53 Ferguson officers were black, while 67 percent of the city’s 21,000 residents are black [i]”.
Unlike 1954, when the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark school desegregation opinion in Brown v. The Board of Education prompting widespread divisiveness and even violence, Michael Brown’s death has created unity.  From the very beginning, countless unnamed citizens have come together demanding that our Nation’s Constitution be upheld.  Human rights are, for the first time, triumphing over deep-seated historical racial and religious biases.  The unequivocal message being sent by the majority of citizens in the world’s most revered democratized nation is that we are no longer willing to complacently accept flagrant civil rights violations.
For months after Michael Brown’s demise the world stood waiting, anticipating the United States would continue as the beacon of democracy by holding the police officer, a public servant, accountable for what was not only a senseless death breaching our Constitution but also an act that may have contravened international human rights treatises to which the United States is a signatory[ii].
The global spotlight was now firmly fixated on the United States as a federal grand jury deliberated whether to return an indictment against the police officer responsible for Michael Brown’s death.
Michael Brown gave the World hope.
On November 24, 2014, the grand jury failed to issue an indictment against the police officer.
Contemporaneous with the issuance of this unfortunate opinion, our Nation expressed its dissatisfaction through the many protests convened. Organizers, de facto defenders of the public trust and true peacekeepers, had anticipated this black day in American history by having laid the foundation for organized and peaceful protests spanning the continent to take place that same evening, which were widely publicized only minutes after the decision was made public. This did not satiate the public.
The gap between the majority position collectively espoused and the grand jury, with the later having been crafted by our founder’s to reflect the majority, is immense. The energy created by what was most certainly a historical event was and remains almost a year later electrifying.  It is the catalyst shocking us back to a mode of ‘conscious’ or deliberate thinking, characterized by corroboration and cooperation.

Mayhem Collides With

Reason:  The Intervening

Months

The protests that began immediately after Michael Brown’s death have continued without pause.  Unlike Nigeria, where we all seem to have forgotten about the “bringing the girls back”, this time the majority was and is insistent that elected officials honor the trust bestowed upon them through the electorate process.
Our voices are projected by the media.  And, yes, since Michael Brown’s death, other incidents of un-redressed police brutality have peppered the news, such as New York City’s Carter shooting, and the Cleveland case.  However, the media has all but ignored similar instances of police brutality, including similar and rampant racial profiling in Brasil, and China’s persecution of Ilham Tohti, a Muslim scholar whose only crime was his advocacy on behalf of the Muslim people in a remote Chinese province. It remains that Ferguson has held the media’s attention making it the case by which we can all learn from.  And learn we must as our Humanity has never before been so desperate for peace.

Seemingly Senseless

A historical review of cases involving police brutality, racism and civil rights violations reflects that not only has our government dishonored our trust but also that we, as citizens, do not openly speak the truth to our leadership, with our primary mode of communication being our right to vote [iii].
In considering what has transpired, I was reminded of a federal civil rights action brought by Hugh “Buck” Davis, an esteemed and fearless attorney who has dedicated his life to championing the rights of the underdog. His success, for many, would be measured in terms of the number of “wins” but, to me, he is a success because he has always spoken the truth, oftentimes taking cases no one else would touch.
For the last decade, I have often visited with him at his offices; classic and strong like him, constructed of marble, granite and mahogany.  Some time ago, Mr. Davis referenced a police brutality case he had been handling for the brother of William C. Scozzari, an African-American man fatally shot at close range by Clare Michigan Police Chief Dwayne Miedzianowski.
According the federal district court:
Scozzari was a hermit and had not allowed anyone, not even family, to enter his cabin in years…While Scozzari loved to collect knives and hatchets, he had no police record, and…had never…engage in any threatening behavior.  Scozzari would not talk to people, he only “grunted.” ….[E]verybody in the department knew Scozzari…
He had been forced out of his cabin without a warrant, raising constitutional issues.  The officers “attempted to kick in his door and order him out of his  cabin in order to arrest him [iv]”.
“Aside from being schizophrenic, William Scozzari was blind in one eye and hard of hearing, court records show.  He stood 5 feet, 3 inches tall and weighed 113 pounds and was known in the community as a recluse who wore a winter coat in the summer and walked around town with his boots untied [v].”
Mr. Scozzari was fatally wounded by multiple bullets fired by Chief Miedzianowski, who chose not to retreat or make any attempt to otherwise subdue Mr. Scozzari, but elected to take a human life.
After years of pretrial proceedings, the case went to trial.  The jury that returned an unfavorable verdict, just as the grand jury in Michael Brown’s case failed to return an indictment.
“Times They Are A Changing”
Trying to understand, I have asked myself “why”.
This is what I know for sure. While most public officials want to “do good” there are those who are, for whatever reason, incapable of honoring the trust with which they have been bestowed.  To hold those breaching our trust accountable, we have a system of “checks and balances”.  Enforcement of that system is the responsibility of each and every one of us.  To this end, we have failed to be ‘conscious’ and, as such, we have, up until now, collectively failed.
The majority has only been willing to use its voice when anonymity can be preserved.  If, however, there is any personal risk, fear holds sway. We have been conditioned to respond to that which we fear rather than to act consistent with what we know is right.  We fear losing our family, friends, homes, jobs and all the other things that we categorize as the “good life”.
So, when called upon to defend and demand justice we shirk from our responsibility as citizens to publicly speak the truth. We do so not out of acquiescence but because to do so jeopardizes our own personal freedom rendering us complacent victims of our own fear. This fear is not something we are born into but something that we are taught and that we, in turn, teach.
Fear is generated by being seated as a grand jury member or juror in a high profile civil rights case as those citizens are called upon to hold accountable officials ‘in their backgrounds’ accountable; officials having membership in the entities having the potential to deprive them and their loved ones of the ‘good life’.
“The reality is that no group of countries has any grounds for complacency about its own human rights performance and no group of countries does itself justice by automatically slipping into the “victim” mode,” stated Nobel Laureate Kofi Annan.
This is what happened in Ferguson. The grand jury was to have honored the majority’s needs, wants and desires to dwell in a harmonious, respectful and peaceful society consistent with our Constitution.  The members of that grand jury were expected to return an indictment. The grand jury failed to do so because they were conditioned so that fear, not reason, held sway.  The same was true in Mr. Scozzari’s case.
“We the People” are now delivering a powerful message to those guilty of malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance that continued human rights violations will no longer be tolerated. We are beginning to heed our instinctual inner voice.
Doing Right
Ferguson represents a shift to conscious thinking.
“You cannot make yourself feel something you do not feel, but you can make yourself do right in spite of your feelings,” suggested the late author Pearl S. Buck
Thus, while Michael Brown’s death may have been senseless ‘consciousness is now driving the universe’ as it represents the first police brutality case in which a majority has come together and taken a strong and unified collective position. In that sense, perhaps we might re-conceptualize Ferguson as a victory.
“When there is a terrible problem, when thinking and the behavior has taken us to a place which is malignant, which is even maladaptive for our survival, there is also something in us which is programmed to correct the system [vi]”, reflected spiritualist Marianne Williamson.
When those universal laws kick-in and we participate in conscious self-correction, we move from fear-based thinking to love-based thinking.  This shift is occurring.
In response to widespread public outcry, the United States Department of Justice launched an investigation into the practices, policies and procedures of the Ferguson Police Department (FPD).  In March 2015, it released a report that the FPD had engaged in misconduct by having engaged in an unconstitutional ‘pattern and practice’ of discriminatory conduct.  It has been characterized as, “a scathing report that cited racial bias and profiling in Ferguson policing and a profit-driven municipal court system that frequently targeted blacks [vii].”
A statement was issued this past week by the FPD that it was proactively working to create a more diverse police force representing the community’s demographic make-up.
ferguson2
There has been citizen response as to police conduct. A local group has spearheaded an effort to join a national initiative that all police officers be required to wear cameras while on duty thus creating an accurate record of what transpires during interactions [viii].
The primary tool that ‘We the People’ possess is our Constitutional right to vote.  We choose our leaders.  There is no fear of reprisal in the electorate process.
“[F]inally persuading the 50 million Americans who do not vote that by not voting they make it possible for people who do not agree with them, do not support their aspirations, to call the shots [ix],” stated Hillary Clinton at a recent public forum held just outside of Ferguson
We need to continue moving forward as a unified Nation, respectful of differences and trusting in one another to defend and demand freedom for those whom it has been or could be denied.
“Words like freedom, justice, democracy are not common concepts; on the contrary, they are rare. People are not born knowing what these are. It takes enormous and, above all, individual effort to arrive at the respect for other people that these words imply,” wrote the late African-American author and playwright James Baldwin.
Sadly, there has remained some divisiveness.  Across the country, but again, with the spotlight on Ferguson, there have been continued acts of violence against person and property.  The most recent report was that, “Vandals have targeted monuments dedicated to the leaders and soldiers of the Confederacy, painting the slogan “Black lives matter” on memorials in a half-dozen states where the landmarks stand tall in parks and outside government buildings [x].”
Mrs. Clinton expounded, “Despite our best efforts and our highest hopes, America’s long struggle with race is far from finished.  We can’t hide from hard truths about race and justice. We have to name them, own them and change them” [xi].
The reality is that all lives matter.
In the words of former President Jimmy Carter:
We will have an unchallenged, open, panoramic opportunity on a global scale to demonstrate the finest aspects of what we know in this country: peace, freedom, democracy, human rights, benevolent sharing, love, the easing of human suffering. Is that going to be our list of priorities or not?

About the Author

Cynthia M. Lardner holds a journalism degree, she is a licensed attorney and trained as a clinical therapist.  Her philosophy is to collectively influence conscious global thinking understanding that everything and everyone is subject to change given the right circumstances;   Standard Theory or Theory of Everything.
This paper is dedicated to my friend, teacher and mentor Hugh “Buck” Davis.


[i] Suhr, Jim, “Ferguson Police Chief Tries to Create More Diverse Force”, June 24, 2015, ABC News, as found on the www at http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ferguson-police-chief-create-diverse-force-32033720.
[ii] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) was drafted by the UN Commission on Human Rights in 1947 and 1948. The Declaration was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948.  Amongst other human rights, this declaration enunciates certain fundamental human rights of every human being which are which are of special interest in the study of the ethics of circumcision. They are the rights to security of person, to freedom from torture and other cruel and unusual treatment, and to privacy. Motherhood and childhood have a right to special protection.
[iii] Police Brutality, The Free Thought Project, as found on the www at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/category/cop-watch/police-brutality-cop-watch/.
[iv] Scozzari  v. City of Clare, 723 F. Supp.2d 945 (E.D. Mich. 2010)(references omitted); Scozzari v. Miedzianowski, 454 F. App. 455 (6th Cir. 2012).
[v] Coleman, LaNia, “Attorney for Clare man killed in run-in with police files second lawsuit”, November 11, 2010, Bay City Times, as found on the www at http://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/index.ssf/2010/11/attorney_for_clare_man_killed.html.
[vi] Williamson, Marianne, “Stand Up, Speak Out”, May 31, 2013, TEDx Traverse City, YouTube, as found on the www at https://youtu.be/KHRE10ZiYjM.
[vii] Suhr, Jim, Infra Endnote No. i.
[viii] Madhani, Ahmer, “Ferguson residents petition for police body camera rules”, June 23, 2015, USA Today, as found on the www at http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/06/23/ferguson-residents-push-for-body-camera-rules/29179439/ (“A group of residents in Ferguson, Mo., announced Tuesday that they are launching a petition drive to amend the city charter to mandate that the city’s police officers wear police body cameras while on duty and establish other rules regulating the use of the devices.”).  See also “More police body cameras, more public trust”, June 27, 2015, The Sun Sentinel, as found on the www at http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-broward-sheriff-body-cams-dv-20150627-story.html (“Once collectively skeptical, more police departments are turning to body cameras to hold officers accountable, regain public trust and protect good officers doing their jobs from errant or made-up accusations of unjustifiable use of force.).
[ix] Karni, Annie, Supra Endnote No. ix.
[x] “Vandals target Confederate monuments, paint post-Ferguson slogan in graffiti in 6 states”, June 26, 2015, Fox News, as found on the www at http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/06/26/vandals-target-confederate-monuments-paint-post-ferguson-slogan-in-graffiti-in/ (“The graffiti reflects the racial tension that permeates post-Ferguson America, more than a week after a white gunman shot and killed nine black congregants at a Charleston, South Carolina, church… Michael Allen, a lecturer in American culture studies at Washington University in St. Louis, compared the vandalism to the toppling of statues in Russia at the end of the Soviet empire.”).
[xi] Karni, Annie, “Hillary Clinton, near Ferguson, calls for confronting ‘hard truths’ about race,” June 23, 2015, Politico, as found on the www at http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/hillary-clinton-ferguson-talk-on-race-119346.html.

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Forgiveness: The Path to Peace

Forgiveness:
The Path to Peace
Introduction
In the footsteps of my teachers, true alchemists, spiritualists, and peacekeepers, I have been taught a new way of life over the last year that is based on building bridges designed to carry adversaries to a place of alliance, and to bring issues confronting and challenging our Humanity to a common gateway.  “My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together,” stated The Most Reverend Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Anglican Emeritus of Cape Town and the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize recipient.
It is, however, putting it into practice that has borne the greatest challenges, disappointments and, ultimately, personal growth.  The disappointments have been immensely personal, requiring acknowledging my own failings; revelations that most often occurred only after concerted, conscious personal reflection.  I think that this has been the greatest step I have taken toward revealing my own humanity to others and this has allowed me to connect on a meaningful level with my brother [1].
This is the Jesus Model of Leadership.  Under the Jesus Model, one washes the feet of those walking in front of one's self.  John 1:15 states that, “He who comes after me ranks before me because he was before me.”  John 13:16 teaches that “[A] servant is not greater than his master, nor is he stronger than the one who sent him.”
The Jesus Model was taught to me through the use of the Socratic Method, with my teachers often serving as mirrors or teaching by way of opposites.   It was as Paolo Coelho wrote in “Veronika Decides to Die”:  “The secret is: fall seven times get up eight times.”
While personal and spiritual work are a forever process, I have come to understand that true leadership starts from deep within; requiring the ability to see from the soul, and to be responsible for the energy brought.  This is what I know for sure.
Forgiveness Challenge
This calls to mind the Archbishop Tutu's Forgiveness Challenge[i]. The underlying premise is that we all have something that we need to be forgiven for and we all have something that we need to forgive. “Forgiveness says that you are given another chance to make a new beginning.”
As the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King stated, “Forgiveness is not an occasional act, it is a permanent attitude.”
The Archbishop called humanity to actively engage in the process of forgiveness.  A part of the forgiveness process is self-forgiveness.  While God's unconditional love grant's forgiveness in the moment, we often fail to see, let alone accept, this Divine gift.  Thus, we must to learn how to proactively engage in the process of self-forgiveness.
Spiritually, the Forgiveness Challenge can be best illustrated by the stories of two contemporary Nobel Peace Prize Laureates.  The first is the late and great Nelson Mandela, who built a bridge upon which South Africa walked from an entrenched place of Apartheid to a modern-day democracy.  The second is Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, affectionately referred to as “The Lady”, who has worked tirelessly to bring Burma, or Myanmar, from a "Militarized Junta" government to an ever-increasing democratized nation.
Before reaching these historical pinnacles both Mr. Mandela and Mrs. Suu Kyi were held captive by the very same individuals with whom they later collaborated.  They were not imprisoned for a day, a week, a month or even a year.  For a combined total of 41 years they were incarcerated under some of the harshest and most inhumane conditions.
Mr. Mandela spent 27 years in prison, under conditions that would have shaken most men of their convictions or, even worse, hastened their death.
Prior to being incarcerated, Mrs. Suu Kyi was elected President of Burma.  Then just a fledgling democracy, a coup was staged and the Junta took control.  Mrs. Suu Kyi then spent 15 years of the next 21 years in both prison and under house arrest.  During the brief gap, Mrs. Suu Kyi could have returned to Britain, where her husband and two sons resided, but she chose to stay in Burma knowing that if she were ever to leave, that she would never be allowed to return to help the nation she loved.  She forego the up-bringing of her sons and being at the deathbed of her now late husband, who was an Oxford scholar.  She attributes her fortitude to the influence of Mahatma Gandhi’s nonviolent methods for political change, and her strong spiritual foundation steeped in meditation.  In 1991, while under house arrest, she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. 
After their release, neither Mr. Mandela nor Mrs. Suu Kyi spoke poorly of their captors or complained about the conditions and treatment during their captivity.  As the Archbishop Tutu instructs, “If I diminish you, I diminish myself.”
Rather, both forgave and, in doing so, they not only built, but illuminated solid bridges for their adversaries, who ultimately crossed over to other shore, creating the alliances necessary to better serve our Humanity, with the outcomes achieved reflecting the wishes of a previously silent majority.  This would not have occurred without forgiveness.
Every major theology references forgiveness as a part of God’s plan.  Consider, for instance, Judaism’s Holiest Day, Yom Kippur, also known as the Day of Atonement, during which not only Jews but groups extending to those which are Christian, work to amend their behavior and seek forgiveness for wrongs done not just against God but against other human beings, with the process including prayers designed to release or lose the observer from the man-mind emotion of guilt.  Yom Kippur epitomizes Religare, the Latin root of religion, which means to bind forth or bring together.  
As for Mr. Mandela, on February 11, 1990, not long after the Berlin Wall fell 25 years ago, he was released from prison.  After delivering a long-awaited but short public speech, he and his then wife Winnie retreated to the home of the Archbishop Tutu.  He immediately took public office. In 1993, Mr. Mandela received the Nobel Peace Prize.  In 1994, Mr. Mandela was elected President of South Africa, a position he held until 1999, after which, in 2007, he went on to become the Founding Father of The Elders, a group of former heads of state who are the world’s only well-recognized, non-partisan peacekeeper group [2].    
While we lost Mr. Mandela on December 5, 2012, his legacy and spirit will forever live on, in part, through the words he once spoke:
No one is born hating another person…People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposition.
Part of love is the expression of and respect for human rights.  To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.
Mrs. Suu Kyi, released November 13, 2009, began building bridges with global partners, including Heads of State, many of whom had declined to engage in similar discourse with the Junta and whose representative countries had more often than not imposed trade embargos and harsh economic sanctions. In April 2012, Mrs. Suu Kyi was elected to a seat in Burma’s newly-created Lower Parliament.  Her work has brought changes to Burma reflecting the will of its people, including long-denied human rights.  There is now hope that she may once again be able to run for its presidency.
“Forgiveness does not mean condoning what has been done.  Forgiving means abandoning your right to pay back the perpetrator in his own coin,” states the Archbishop Tutu. This is a separate and distinct concept from accountability for ‘breaching the public trust’, the enforcement of which must be turned over to a Higher Power as to the “how” and “when”.  In part, this is what is meant by consciousness drives the universe to bring about intended outcomes consistent with Universal Laws.
“It is not power that corrupts, but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it,” stated Mrs. Suu Kyi in her speech “Freedom From Fear”. 
Mrs. Suu Kyi stated fear causes many leaders to lose sight of their purpose, stating "Government leaders are amazing.  So often it seems they are the last to know what the people want."  
Many leaders have failed to be mindful of what the silent majority desires, wants and needs. [3]
Conclusion
I am asking each and every one of you, to partake in the Archbishop Desmond Tutu's Forgiveness Challenge.



[1] Nadine Hack, in her March 2013 TEDx talk “Adversaries to Allies”, taught the importance of revealing one’s own humanity and the need to identify and build bridges for all stakeholders.  http://youtu.be/u_zyi6ea874.
The Archbishop Tutu was also an Elder until his advancing years required that he step down from an active to an honorary role.  Mrs. Suu Kyi was also an Elder until she took public office.  Elders cannot hold public office. 
The Elders are currently chaired by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and former United Nations Secretary General, Kofi Annan.  Graca Marcel, Mr. Mandela’s surviving spouse is an Elder as if former President Jimmy Carter and Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland and head of the United Nations Development Programme.  
The Elders number 12, and have an Advisory Board from the international sectarian community, including the Skool Foundation, the Said Business School at Oxford University, and Sir Richard Branson.
[3] http://cynthialardner.blogspot.com/2014/09/i-believe-in-magic-of-kindness.html




[i] http://forgivenesschallenge.com/.  

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Pay It Back Going Forward

In Memory of My Teacher, Annemarie Roeper, I Fear Not

(August 27, 1918 – May 11, 2012)

Legendary educator Annemarie Roeper once told me that ‘if you plan on standing up for the underdog don't expect to be popular’. 

What is soon be a year ago, I tweeted out this sentiment praying these powerful words would inspire others just as they had inspired me.  One response flooded me with such emotion that my eyes welled up with tears:

"The emotions are the heart and soul of giftedness.  The heart and soul of the human being is my passion. Anne Marie Roeper :)", tweeted Joseph Ephraim from his account @freelancejoe, to which I almost immediately replied with the tears then streaming down my face:

"She was my teacher.  Three years before passing in 2012 she wrote to me, "Don't you see I will always be with you?"

At age 16, Annemarie Roeper was the youngest protégé of Anna Freud to ever enter medical school, an honor cut short when the Nazi’s marched on Vienna, where she had grown-up across the street from Sigmund Freud and his family.  She fled Europe with her husband-to-be George, with whom she had bonded with at age 6 when he had first arrived at her parents’ boarding school.  Arriving in the United States, they made their way to Michigan where they founded The Roeper School.  While The Roeper School was established to meet the unique needs of gifted children, Annemarie’s vision of what constitutes education embraced all children for which she emphasized the necessity of a holistic or ‘whole child’ approach.

Her vision transcended education to include a ‘global view’ about which she was wrote as early as the 1940s.  To her, a global view is to see “the whole of the community and the ramifications in the world”[1].

Possessing a global view since her childhood, Annemarie was a natural humanist, possessing a finely honed, internally developed sense of justice and fair play.  She was not only profound in her wisdom but in her fearlessness in acting upon her convictions.  She never wavered from a position necessary to bring about a fair or just result.

She modeled her inner strength to me in a situation that not only proved life-altering but is directly related to the situation now negatively impacting my children and me. This occurred over a decade ago during the initial conflict with the Warren Consolidated School District which, in turn, precipitated a decision by The Roeper School that my oldest daughter was no longer going to be accepted as a student at the school which had not only provided her an education but had come to be a second home for my children and me.  Ultimately, my daughter continued her education at The Roeper School. 

The details of that conflict are no longer relevant.  What is relevant is that while that conflict was on-going, Annemarie, after having unsuccessfully advocated that the school’s decision to exclude my daughter was contrary to the very ethics upon which it was founded, resigned her position on the Board of Trustees.  Her decision, consciously arrived at and executed without any hesitation, was the catalyst for resolution.

Resigning her position on the Board of Trustees was incomprehensible to me as The Roeper School had meant the world to Annemarie and her then late husband George.  For years, I functioned under the ego-based misconception that she had done so for me as we had a teacher/student relationship.  It would many years and not until after her death before I understood that her decision had absolutely nothing to do with me.  Annemarie acted as she did because it was the only right thing to do if she were to honor her deeply held inner-developed core beliefs.  Her faith in what she believed was stronger than the need to maintain the last vestiges of a formal role with the school she loved so very much.  That was and is to this day powerful.
.
In standing in silence with the truth for all these years, I had wondered if I might have somehow honored her legacy, her conscious decision to be my teacher, and the investment of her time spent teaching.  This was a question I repeatedly asked myself.  The answer was “No”, until now.  What I know for sure is that it is one thing to stand in silence with the truth but, it is an entirely different reality to feel unfettered in speaking the truth in a dignified manner with the intention that there be relevant social change.   

Annemarie wrote that in order develop the same the psychological mechanisms she had modeled for me, the student must first feel unconditional love and acceptance by their teacher, with that relationship having a shared interest in a subject matter.  I have found this unconditional love with my current teachers.  We have as shared ethos as to the inviolate nature of a breach of the public trust and as to the rights of all children to be protected from harm. 

“When selves have gone through many of these states of growth without losing their emotional ability to grow, they almost invariably become people with a sense of justice who understand their interdepedence with the rest of the world.”  (pg 40).

Annemarie explained:

“Society does not see the world as interdependent, but rather as divided by those at the top of the hierarchy and those that serve them…Over the centuries, we have seen that this framework does not work. It has led to the belief that humankind is master of the work, which it is not.  Moreover, it has led to great destruction and tragedy for earth and humankind.” (pg 93).

She was definitive that we “see the community as a circle of interdependence, rather than a hierarchy of dependency, with peers and community members as cooperators.”  (pg 100).

My faith is unwavering.  I am committed to honoring Annemarie and all of my other teachers by paying it back going forward.

#ImaginePeace
#OneOhana
#DeverouxCleary
#AnnemarieRoeper
#SpeakingTheTruth
#Interdependence
#Community
#UnconditionalLove





[1] The “I” of the Beholder, by Annemarie Roeper, Ed.D., with Ann Higgins, Great Potential Press (2007).